Modular code means that the code is easily reusable; It does not mean that the code has to all be in one file. That's what modules and libraries are for. ;)
~ Danial Goodwin ~
Showing posts with label meaning. Show all posts
Showing posts with label meaning. Show all posts
2014-07-02
2013-11-23
Arguing Versus Debating
(These two words may be synonyms at a basic level, but can mean two different things.)
It is useless to have two different words mean the exact same thing.
Typically, there are different levels of meaning (i.e., big vs huge vs gargantuan). But, unfortunately, it takes a long time to learn the specific differences/intricacies between all of the words we use. So, in order for us to better communicate our thoughts to one another, I write this post. Here is goes:
Here's my common definitions for "arguing":
- At a rudimentary level, "complaining for the sake of it".
- At a basic level, "explaining, using logical fallacies".
- From a chess perspective, "perfectly symmetrical debating that has stalemated 5+ moves ago (think: KvK)".
Here's my common definitions for "debating":
- At an elementary level, "listing pros and cons"
- At a fundamental level, "two sides taking turns, presenting their ideas to the other. Typically has an outcome."
- From a military/infantry perspective, "arguing in the form of bounding overwatch, where progress is achieved."
If you have any comments about arguing versus debating, then I'd like to hear you in the comments below.
~ Danial Goodwin ~
ps - One reason I like to spend time to write posts is so that:
1. I can better understand myself,
2. Others can better understand me,
3. Others can better understand themselves,
4. Others can better understand each other,
5. And, if there are comments, then I can better understand others. ;]
It is useless to have two different words mean the exact same thing.
Typically, there are different levels of meaning (i.e., big vs huge vs gargantuan). But, unfortunately, it takes a long time to learn the specific differences/intricacies between all of the words we use. So, in order for us to better communicate our thoughts to one another, I write this post. Here is goes:
I don't like to argue. But, I do like to debate.
If I ever say, "I don't like/want to argue", then this is really what I mean...Here's my common definitions for "arguing":
- At a rudimentary level, "complaining for the sake of it".
- At a basic level, "explaining, using logical fallacies".
- From a chess perspective, "perfectly symmetrical debating that has stalemated 5+ moves ago (think: KvK)".
Here's my common definitions for "debating":
- At an elementary level, "listing pros and cons"
- At a fundamental level, "two sides taking turns, presenting their ideas to the other. Typically has an outcome."
- From a military/infantry perspective, "arguing in the form of bounding overwatch, where progress is achieved."
If you have any comments about arguing versus debating, then I'd like to hear you in the comments below.
~ Danial Goodwin ~
ps - One reason I like to spend time to write posts is so that:
1. I can better understand myself,
2. Others can better understand me,
3. Others can better understand themselves,
4. Others can better understand each other,
5. And, if there are comments, then I can better understand others. ;]
2013-11-19
"No reason" is not always "no reason"
Think about that for a little bit,
"no reason" is not always "no reason".
Have you ever given the reason or excuse, "no reason"?
At first it seems like a simple phrase that could just be expanded to, "for no reason at all".
But, if you care to think about it a little more, then there are actually two different ways to interpret "no reason", like so:
~ Danial Goodwin ~
ps - I may have used some aggressive adjectives in this post that are too indicative. One reason I write like this is to practice my copywriting so that I can more clearly express myself fully.
pps - "Because because" is not always a non-answer. But, it is definitely a unfinished sentence/idea.
"no reason" is not always "no reason".
Have you ever given the reason or excuse, "no reason"?
At first it seems like a simple phrase that could just be expanded to, "for no reason at all".
But, if you care to think about it a little more, then there are actually two different ways to interpret "no reason", like so:
- Arbitrarily, no reason...
- Because, no reason...
This has the potential to have significant implications depending on its use case. The first interpretation is the more literal definition that really does mean zero (0) reasons. The second interpretation is the more exciting definition that allows for spontaneity.
Now, how does this help you, the reader?
Honesty, I'm not sure that this knowledge helps you with any practical applications in life. Examples are hard to come by because just about all the "no reason" excuses/reasons could be purposeful or not. It just depends on the person and their conviction/confidence.
~ Danial Goodwin ~
ps - I may have used some aggressive adjectives in this post that are too indicative. One reason I write like this is to practice my copywriting so that I can more clearly express myself fully.
pps - "Because because" is not always a non-answer. But, it is definitely a unfinished sentence/idea.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)